Cases 51 - 60 of 599
Almeida v. Skilonger et al
as 3:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
Jarret A. Almeida
Defendant:
Thomas Skilonger and John J. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ALMEIDA v. RMK MERRILL STEVENS LLC
as 1:2023cv21938
Plaintiff:
LAZARO ALMEIDA
Defendant:
RMK MERRILL STEVENS LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Almeida v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv03867
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Almeida
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ALMEIDA v. M&N CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
WILINTON ALMEIDA
Defendant:
M&N CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LLC and MIGUEL R. RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Littlefield, et al v. US Dept of the Interior, et al
as 23-1197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LITTLEFIELD, MICHELLE LITTLEFIELD, TRACY ACORD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America and others
DUKES v. MCCALLUM et al
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Terry Dukes, Sr. and TERRY DUKES, SR
Defendant:
Sheriff Robert McCallum, Jr., Chase Gregory, Tucker Gaffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
