Cases 1 - 8 of 8
James Clark v. Floyd Crues, et al
as 21-1610
Defendant / Appellee:
Darnetta Clinkscale, Shane Hopper, Ken Brostrum and others
Defendant:
Amy Hilgerman, Bill Hass, School Service Systems, (SSS) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Hedman Clark
Plaintiff:
Alternative Discipline and Behavioral Concepts (ADBC)
Chesapeake Bank v. Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. et al
as 4:2014mc09020
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Bank
Defendant:
Alternatives Unlimited, Inc., Stuart D Berger, Deborah D Berger and others
Receiver:
Keith M. Northern
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Chesapeake Bank v. Alternatives Unlimited, Inc.
as 4:2014mc02510
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Bank
Defendant:
Alternatives Unlimited, Inc., Stuart D Berger , Deborah D Berger and others
Receiver:
Keith M. Northern
Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. v. Schukman et al
as 1:2012cv01821
Plaintiff:
Alternatives Unlimited, Inc.
Defendant:
Drew Schukman, Mary Ramirez, Judy Shopp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. v. EdisonLearning, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03112
Plaintiff:
Alternatives Unlimited, Inc.
Defendant:
EdisonLearning, Inc. , Liberty Partners L.P. , Buckley King, LPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. v. Group Excellence, Ltd. et al
as 3:2010cv02283
Plaintiff:
Alternatives Unlimited Inc
Defendant:
Group Excellence Ltd, Confidence Music Inc, Carl Dorvil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALTERNATIVES UNLIMITED, INC. v. THE INTERBORO SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2010cv06077
Plaintiff:
ALTERNATIVES UNLIMITED, INC.
Defendant:
THE INTERBORO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. v. Brown et al
as 4:2010cv03202
Plaintiff:
Alternatives Unlimited, Inc.
Defendant:
Jeremy Vincent Brown, Monica brown, Marie L. Brown and others
Counter_claimant:
Jeremy Vincent Brown
Counter_defendant:
Alternatives Unlimited, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
