Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ada City of et al v. Walmart Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00748
Defendant:
Walmart Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Ada City of, Altus City of, Anadarko City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Chester v. Altus City of et al
as 5:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Allie Thomas Chester
Defendant:
Altus City of, Trea Fulton and Jason Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Levick et al
as 5:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jordan Trevon Williams
Defendant:
Roger Levick, Altus City of and Abel Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Fulton et al
as 5:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
Felix Vasquez
Defendant:
Trea Fulton and Altus City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters et al v. City of Altus, Oklahoma et al
as 5:2021cv00865
Plaintiff:
Bradley Waters and Bryan Waters
Defendant:
Altus City of, FNU LNU, Sheriff Roger Levick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Altus City of et al
as 5:2021cv00909
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Wilson
Defendant:
Altus City of, Abel Gonzales and Roger Levick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altus City of v. Cephalon Inc et al
as 1:2021op45046
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Anda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Altus City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Altus City of v. Cephalon Inc et al
as 5:2020cv01180
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, Keysource Medical Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Altus City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
