Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Ethridge v. Samsung SDI Co. Ltd et al
as 3:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Ethridge
Defendant:
SAMSUNG SDI CO. LTD, AMAZON. COM, INC., Amazon.com Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERNANDEZ v. AMAZON.COM, INC
as 2:2021cv17876
Plaintiff:
JESSICA HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
AMAZON .COM, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jennifer LM Sendzul v. Jay C Hoag et al
as 2:2021cv06894
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L.M. Sendzul
Defendant:
Jay C Hoag, Knights Capital 111 LLC, Michaela Hoag and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
City of East St. Louis v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00561
Defendant:
Peacock TV, LLC, DirectTV Corporation, Hulu, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of East St. Louis, Illinois and City of East St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bonilla v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01130
Defendant:
AMAZON COM, INC., Amazon.Com, Inc. and HarperCollins Publishers L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Mariacristina Bonilla
Interested Party:
Mary Christopherson-Juve, Sandra Wilde, Shannon Fremgen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
AUDREY YEUNG v. AMAZON.COM, INC et al
as 1:2020cv15579
Plaintiff:
WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY a/s/o AUDREY YEUNG and AUDREY YOUNG
Defendant:
AMAZON .COM, INC, ABC CORP (1-20) and AMAZON.COM INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv19985
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Long M.D. et al v. Amazon. Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08499
Plaintiff:
Raymond Long, M.D. and Bandha Yoga Publications, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon. Com, Inc., John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Demos v. Apple Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02632
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Apple Inc, Yahoo Inc, Google Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
