Cases 71 - 80 of 100
DASH v. AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv03521
Defendant:
AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC. , TIFFANY AUSTIN and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Plaintiff:
QUANIQUA DASH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Love v. Weecoo(TM) et al
as 1:2018cv00540
Plaintiff:
Irvin R. Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Weecoo(TM), Panda Town, Amazon.com, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brittany Hagman et al v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00024
Defendant:
Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., Does and Golden State FC LLC
Plaintiff:
Alberto Gianini and Brittany Hagman
Beautyko LLC et al v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.
as 1:2018mc00026
Defendant:
Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Beautyko LLC, Beautyko USA Inc., Bennoti USA Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12655
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv00814
Plaintiff:
Central Freight Lines, Inc.
Defendant:
Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv03147
Defendant:
Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Central Freight Lines, Inc.
Burris v. Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. (TV2)
as 1:2017cv00113
Defendant:
Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dee Burris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MS Truck Line Inc v. Amazon Fulfillment Services Inc et al
as 3:2017cv01038
Plaintiff:
MS Truck Line Inc
Defendant:
Amazon Fulfillment Services Inc and Knight Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
