Cases 61 - 70 of 3,309
Thomas v. Amazon.com Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01447
Plaintiff:
Natiaal Thomas
Defendant:
AMAZON. COM, INC. and LLC AMAZON.COM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Fisher v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
as 4:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Darnell Fisher
Defendant:
LLC AMAZON.COM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Goggins et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
David Goggins, Goggins Built Not Born, LLC, Goggins, LLC and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jackson v. FKG Logistics, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv02083
Plaintiff:
Dynasty S. Jackson
Defendant:
FKG Logistics, LLC, Kazoubi Said, Amazon Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Zhang v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 3:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Ryan Zhang
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Daniel Grant v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
Daniel Grant
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WFR IP, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
WFR IP, LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
