Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Andrew Miller v. Molly Macone, et al
as 25-2146
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Lloyd Miller
Defendant:
Molly Macone, Washington County, Child Support Division, Minnesota Department of Human Services, DHS and others
Andrew Miller v. Molly Macone, et al
as 25-2026
Plaintiff:
Andrew David Lloyd Miller
Defendant:
Molly Macone, Washington County, Child Support Division, Minnesota Department of Human Services, DHS and others
BARBOA v. COLUMBUS AIRPORT COMMISSION, et al.
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
DANYELL BARBOA
Defendant:
Columbus Airport Commission, CODY DAVENPORT, ART GUIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00063
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Jaimee Fowler et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv01359
Plaintiff:
Tawna Alleman, Tanyell Allen, Jessica Allo and others
Defendant:
Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Clark v. Clark et al
as 1:2009at00743
Defendant:
Jared Clark, Galen Rex Dance and G & M Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amber Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Clark et al v. Dance et al
as 1:2009at00744
Plaintiff:
Jared Clark and Amber Clark
Defendant:
Galen Rex Dance and G & M Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Clark et al v. Dance et al
as 1:2009cv01642
Plaintiff:
Jared Clark and Amber Clark
Defendant:
Galen Rex Dance, G & M Express, Inc., Black Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Clark et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2007oe40478
Plaintiff:
Amber Clark and Daniel Clark
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho McNeil Pharmaceutical Inc and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
