Cases 41 - 50 of 373
David Barrow v. Gary Williams
as 21-7593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JAMES BARROW
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY WILLIAMS, GARY T. SETTLE, HAROLD W. CLARKE and others
Does, et al v. Mills, et al
as 21-1826
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOES, 1-3, JACK DOES, 1-1000, JANE DOES, 1-6 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Maine, JEANNE LAMBREW, NIRAV D. SHAH, in his official capacity as Director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention and others
Petitioner:
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MAINE and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLOBAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE and METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCHES
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2021cv02627
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
NetChoice LLC et al v. Paxton
as 1:2021cv00840
Plaintiff:
NetChoice LLC a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association a 501(c)(6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Progress, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, The American Civil Liberties Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lay v. American Civil Liberties Union, et al
as 21-6095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCOTT CROW and others
State of Texas v. Biden
as 21-10806
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Missouri
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union, Law School Clinics, American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and others
State of Arizona, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 21-16118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona and STATE OF MONTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, ACLU OF MONTANA and ACLU OF ARIZONA
Coe et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Sheriff Brad Coe, Galveston County, Sheriff Arvin West and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NETCHOICE LLC et al v. MOODY et al
as 4:2021cv00220
Defendant:
KYMBERLEE CURRY SMITH, PATRICK GILLESPIE, JONI ALEXIS POITIER and others
Plaintiff:
COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION doing business as CCIA, NETCHOICE, LLC doing business as NETCHOICE and NETCHOICE LLC doing business as NETCHOICE
Amicus Curiae:
TECHFREEDOM, CHAMBER OF PROGRESS, CONNECTED COMMERCE COUNCIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Florida v. USA, et al
as 21-11715
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, TROY MILLER, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Amicus Curiae:
VICTIMS OF ILLEGAL ALIEN CRIME, STATE OF TEXAS, IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
