Cases 1 - 10 of 11
PATTON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv00124
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
AMIEN MUFEED PATTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krushin v. Kosek et al
as 4:2016cv01540
Plaintiff:
Raymond M. Krushin
Defendant:
Gunner Kosek, Dr. Diaz, LCCF Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Faiveley Transport USA, Inc. v. Wabtec Corporation
as 11-3629
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Faiveley Transport USA, Inc., Faiveley Transport Nordic AB, Faiveley Transport Amiens S.A.S and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Wabtec Corporation
Faiveley Transport USA, Inc. v. Wabtec Corporation
as 11-3518
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Faiveley Transport USA, Inc., Faiveley Transport Nordic AB, Faiveley Transport Amiens S.A.S and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Wabtec Corporation
In re: Wabtec Corporation
as 11-2146
Petitioner:
Wabtec Corporation
Respondent:
Faiveley Transport USA, Inc., Faiveley Transport Nordic AB, Faiveley Transport Amiens S.A.S and others
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 10-2940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK A. MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS C. CARROLL and others
Faiveley Transport USA, Inc. et al v. Wabtec Corporation
as 1:2010cv04062
Plaintiff:
Faiveley Transport USA, Inc. , Faiveley Transport Nordic AB , Faiveley Transport Amiens S.A.S. and others
Defendant:
Wabtec Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
