Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Greene v. Amtrak
as 1:2019cv02414
Plaintiff:
Patricia Annette Greene
Defendant:
Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garbarczyk v. National Railroad Passenger Corp
as 1:2019cv00759
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a AMTRAK
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GARBARCZYK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin Rugamba v. MTA Police Officer 1
as 19-1053
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, MTA BUS DRIVER, DOES 1-20 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MTA POLICE OFFICER 1
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN RUGAMBA
Santiago v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2018cv03137
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE SANTIAGO
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a AMTRAK and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rice-Lyles v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
as 1:2018cv00876
Plaintiff:
Helen Rice-Lyles
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taribi v. Tevis et al
as 1:2018cv00806
Plaintiff:
Ebenezar Taribi
Defendant:
Joshua Paul Tevis and National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirkpatrick v. AMTRAK (Auto Train)
as 8:2018cv00418
Plaintiff:
Brenda Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
AMTRAK (Auto Train)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SWEPSON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 1:2017cv01138
Plaintiff:
EULA JO SWEPSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Martin Rugamba v. Rockledge Bus (Tour), Inc.
as 16-2391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN RUGAMBA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROCKLEDGE BUS (TOUR), INC., ROCKLEDGE BUS (TOUR) INC. SUPERVISOR, MTA POLICE OFFICER 1 and others
Roundtree v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corp
as 1:2016cv03418
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Roundtree
Defendant:
Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
