Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Rodriguez et al v. Nationwide Insurance Company of America
as 1:2025cv01114
Plaintiff:
Adrian Rodriguez and Amy Rodriguez
Defendant:
Nationwide Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rathod et al v. Providence Health & Services et al
as 2:2020cv00394
Defendant:
PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES, d/b/a PROVIDENCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER EVERETT and/or PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL OF EVERETT, a Washington corporation, OBSTETRIX MEDICAL GROUP OF WASHINGTON, INC., P.S., John/Jane Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
P. R., Adnand Rathod, Aesha Rathod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rathod et al v. Providence Health & Services et al
as 2:2020cv00064
Defendant:
PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES,, Amy Rodriguez, Community Health Center of Snohomish County and others
Plaintiff:
PR, Adnand Rathod, Aesha Rathod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Corie Armstrong et al v. Ralphs Grocery Company et al
as 2:2014cv04193
Plaintiff:
Corie Armstrong and Amy Rodriguez
Defendant:
Does and Ralphs Grocery Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03827
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011cv00437
Plaintiff:
Amy Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
