Cases 1 - 10 of 13
(PS) Andreyev v. Van et al
as 2:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
Eugene E. Andreyev
Defendant:
Amy Van, Alexander A. Turcotte, Klockenbrink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Van Ryswyk v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01366
Plaintiff:
Amy Van Ryswyk
Defendant:
Acting Cm'r SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Swarthout v. FreightCenter, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv02910
Defendant:
Ali Choiniere, Matthew Brosius, Amy Van Ness and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Swarthout and Patrick Clarke
Dorsey v. FreightCenter, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv00746
Plaintiff:
Jon Dorsey
Defendant:
Matthew Brosius, Jamie Smith, FreightCenter, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2020cv00593
Defendant:
Amy Van Ostrand, Timothy C. Rowe, Tyrone C. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Whobrey and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Lund v. Hove' Parfumeur Ltd, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv06061
Plaintiff:
Ashley Lund
Defendant:
Hove' Parfumeur Ltd, Inc, Bill Wendel and Amy Van Calsem-Wendel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216
Ajamian v. Zakurian
as 16-2887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert H. Ajamian
Defendant - Appellee:
Samuel Egish Zakurian, Amy Van Dam, Michael Maillet and others
Ajamian v. Zakurian et al
as 2:2015cv07442
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Ajamian
Defendant:
Amy Van Dam, Fiserv Securities, Inc., Michael Maillet and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
