Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cohen v. Iowa City, Iowa et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Emily Cohen
Defendant:
Iowa City, Iowa, Johnson County Sheriff's Department, Johnson County, Iowa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
HARTMAN v. HARRAH'S RESORT ATLANTIC CITY
as 1:2023cv01789
Plaintiff:
ANDREW HARTMAN
Defendant:
HARRAH'S ATLANTIC CITY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC d/b/a HARRAH'S RESORT ALTANTIC CITY, JOHN DOES 1-10, JOHN DOE SECURITY PERSONNEL 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Meza v. Engelmann et al
as 1:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
David Meza
Defendant:
Jennifer Engelmann, Kate Herolds, Andrew Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03715
Plaintiff:
ANDREW HARTMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hartman v. Lanham
as 3:2022cv00136
Petitioner:
John Andrew Hartman
Respondent:
Brian Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Accommodations)
HARTMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv14543
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW HARTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt v. Petek et al
as 1:2019cv00383
Defendant:
Adrian Van Nice, Erie Police Department, The, Brandon Beggan and others
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
