Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Miller v. Terry
as 2:2017cv04217
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Defendant:
Warden Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. State of West Virginia
as 5:2017cv04159
Petitioner:
Andrew Miller
Respondent:
Ralph Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00580
Plaintiff:
Cynthia N. Miller and Andrew Miller
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2015cv01581
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , David Ballard , Margaret Clifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv30978
Plaintiff:
Yvette Miller and Keith Andrew Miller
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Ballard et al
as 2:2014cv16868
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Defendant:
David Ballard , Jim Rubenstein , David Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amguard Insurance Company v. M&M Transportation, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Amguard Insurance Company
Defendant:
M&M Transportation, LLC, Miller & Sons Auto and Truck Repair, Inc., Kevin E. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Ballard et al
as 2:2013cv15024
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Defendant:
David Ballard and Jim Rubenstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long et al v. M&M Transportation, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tyler Long , Christopher Emmett Long and Edy Long
Defendant:
M&M Transportation, LLC , Miller & Sons Auto and Truck Repair, Inc. , Kevin E. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Ballard et al
as 2:2013cv08573
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Defendant:
David Ballard and Captain Matheney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
