Cases 21 - 30 of 46
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Garnica
as 2:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Angel Gutierrez Garnica
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Garnica
as 2:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Angel Gutierrez Garnica
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Miguel Gutierrez-Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72665
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL GUTIERREZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Roberto Angeles-Gutierrez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-60523
Petitioner:
ROBERTO ANGELES-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fernando Ivan Torres-Quinonez
as 2:2011mj01679
Material Witne:
Miguel Aguilar-Vargas, Federico Brizuela-De Anda, Leobardo Cornejo-Navarro and others
Defendant:
Fernando Ivan Torres-Quinonez (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
USA v. Torres-Quinonez
as 2:2011mj01679
Material Witne:
Miguel Aguilar-Vargas, Federico Brizuela-De Anda, Leobardo Cornejo-Navarro and others
Defendant:
Fernando Ivan Torres-Quinonez (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Miguel Gutierrez-Escobar v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-71087
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL GUTIERREZ-ESCOBAR
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Gutierrez-Aguilar v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00416
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Gutierrez-Aguilar
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gutierrez v. United States Of America
as 5:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Gutierrez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Benavides (Rios)
as 11-209
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Yunior Benavides, AKA Junior, Ariel Jose Gil, AKA Jose Ortiz Berrios, AKA Jose Ortiz del Rio, Juan Carlos Monserrate, AKA Juancito and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Manuel Rios, AKA Verdugo, AKA Manolo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
