Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
LOUCK v. SANOFI US SERVICES INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02000
Defendant:
HOSPIRA WORLDWIDE, LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC., SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANGIE LOUCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STRONG v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
SEAN STRONG
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, C. CONYERS, SIMONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WELLS v. BAGIENSKI et al
as 1:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
QUANARDEL WELLS
Defendant:
MISSY BAGIENSKI, LISA HAMBLEN, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDuffy v. English et al
as 3:2022cv01051
Plaintiff:
James Dawayne McDuffy and James McDuffy
Defendant:
English, William Hyatte, Michael Gapski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
HERBERT E. ROBERTSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CONYERS, WEXFORD HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CRAIN v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
DURELL T. CRAIN
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., J. BASINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
