Cases 11 - 20 of 30
ANGLE v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2019cv00054
Defendant:
SHEZLEY, COWEN, UNIT MANAGER BLICKA and others
Plaintiff:
ANGLE and BRYAN ANGLE, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ANGLE v. SUPERINTENDANT OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT OVERMYER, SCI FOREST MEDICAL DEP'T, KIM SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANGLE v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
T. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANGLE v. CARTER et al
as 1:2016cv00276
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
CARTER, DAVIS, STEED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIEMOCZYNSKI et al v. UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
LEON NIEMOCZYNSKI, JR. and NALINA NIEMOCZYNSKI
Defendant:
UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP OF PENNSYLVANIA , UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD, ROBERT CARTWRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. ENERFAB CORP. et al
as 2:2015cv01176
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. NELSON
Defendant:
ENERFAB CORP., INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, LOCAL 154 and MARK ANGLE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
ANGLE v. WOODSIDE et al
as 2:2014cv00880
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
DIANNA WOODSIDE, JOHN/JANE DOE 1, JOHN/JANE DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANGLE v. HAYES et al
as 2:2014cv02325
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE
Defendant:
KEITH A. HAYES, TERRENCE FARRELL, KATHI COZZONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANGLE v. DICKEY et al
as 1:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
DICKEY, WISE, BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ANGLE v. SMEAL et al
as 1:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, DERINA VARNER, SAUERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
