Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Hill v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv20915
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Hill
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08012
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Ann Hill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28570
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Hill
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill et al v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Sandy Anne Hill and Charles Fanel Hill
Defendant:
MENTOR CORPORATION and MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv25800
Plaintiff:
Julie Anne Hill and Shawn Hill
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill et al v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 0:2013cv02825
Plaintiff:
Sandy Anne Hill and Charles Fanel Hill
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation and Mentor Worldwide LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02360
Plaintiff:
Brandon Watson Gentry , Madeline Elaine Gentry , Scott Godfrey and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
HILL et al v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv69274
Plaintiff:
BILLY RICHARD HILL and MARY ANN HILL
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HILL v. ABER CO, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv73666
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. HILL, SR. and CAROLYN ANN HILL
Defendant:
ABER CO, INC., W.R. GRACE & CO., PITTSBURGH CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
