Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Birla et al v. Metropolitan Commercial Bank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02019
Plaintiff: Georr Malaviga Birla and United States of America Ex. Rel.
Defendant: Metropolitan Commercial Bank, Revolut Tecnologies, London HQ and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
(SS) Potts v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01566
Plaintiff: Pamela Anne Potts
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Potts v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2016cv00544
Plaintiff: Patricia Ann Potts
Defendant: State Of Texas, Helen Marie Leonard, Vincent Duane William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potts v. Colvin et al
as 4:2015mc00913
Plaintiff: Patricia Ann Potts
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin and Veronda Durden
Potts v. Burger
as 4:2014mc01342
Petitioner: Patricia Ann Potts
Respondent: Sharon Burger
Potts et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-18227
Plaintiff: Lora Ann Potts and Brian Potts
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Potts et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv18227
Plaintiff: Lora Ann Potts and Brian Potts
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: Patricia Ann Pott
as 10-20186
Appellant: PATRICIA ANN POTTS
POTTS et al v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv93558
Plaintiff: CHARLES D. POTTS and STEPHANIE ANNE POTTS
Defendant: RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION and RILEY POWER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Keith Drunasky v. Arizona Department of Economic, et al
as 08-16316
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEITH L. DRUNASKY
Defendant - Appellee: ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY, STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SUSAN ANN POTTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?