Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Shirley Stewart v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 17-1862
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHIRLEY ANN STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., THOMAS S. WINKOWSKI, EDWIN C. ROESSLER, Fairfax County Police Department and others
Defendant:
RONALD C. MACHEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, and Wife, JASON P. MANYX, and Wife and others
Shirley Stewart v. US
as 16-2221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHIRLEY ANN STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stewart v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08085
Plaintiff:
Corrinne Ann Stewart
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEWART v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2016cv00682
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ann Stewart
Defendant:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr., Ronald C. Machen, Jr., Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Stewart v. Geriatric Practitioner Solutions Inc et al
as 1:2016cv00324
Plaintiff:
Merry Ann Stewart
Defendant:
Geriatric Practitioner Solutions Inc and Jerry A Nettles, Jr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stewart v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01222
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Stewart
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shirley Stewart v. James Dimon
as 15-1898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHIRLEY ANN STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DIMON, The Chairman and CEO of J.P. Morgan Bank, N.A., LELA MARIE AMES and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Stewart et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03376
Plaintiff:
Ann Stewart and Willie Stewart
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01803
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Ann Stewart and Don Joseph Stewart
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart v. Dimon
as 1:2014cv01707
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ann Stewart
Defendant:
James Dimon , Lela Ames and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
