Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Gallo v. City of New York
as 1:2020cv08048
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK and City Of New York
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gallo
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Anthony Gallo v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2019cv01960
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gallo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GALLO v. WEAVER et al
as 2:2019cv01260
Plaintiff:
LOUIS ANTHONY GALLO
Defendant:
DALE BROWN, JOHN DOE, JOHN KEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GALLO v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2017cv05122
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY GALLO
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JULIO M. ALGARIN, G. ANDREW SZEKELY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Progressive American Insurance Company v. Kanzer et al
as 8:2016cv01154
Plaintiff:
Progressive American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Stephen R. Kanzer , Anthony Gallo , Morgan & Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Charles Alexander, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 14-55948
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES ALEXANDER, STEPHEN AMBERG, CAROLIND AMEZQUITA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a California corporation
Charles Alexander, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 14-55948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ALEXANDER, STEPHEN AMBERG, CAROLIND AMEZQUITA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA, a California corporation
Charles Alexander et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 2:2014cv01303
Plaintiff:
Charles Alexander, Stephen Amberg, Carolind Amezquita and others
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
GALLO v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv00987
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GALLO
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
