Cases 1 - 10 of 69
The Estate of Jane Doe 202 v. City of North Charleston et al
as 2:2023cv05139
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Jane Doe 202
Defendant:
City of North Charleston, Leigh Anne McGowan, Charles Francis Wholleb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Harford Co. Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Williams
Defendant:
Harford Co. Sheriff Department and Jamal Beech
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Colavito v. Diehl et al
as 3:2022cv00817
Petitioner:
Anthony M. Colavito
Defendant:
William Diehl, A. Joyce and Ms. Rudacill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Janson
as 6:2022cv03813
Petitioner:
Anthony M Lyons
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wise v. Perkins et al
as 8:2022cv01468
Plaintiff:
Anthony M Wise
Defendant:
Miles Perkins, Steven Fleshman, Christopher Campisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dorsey v. Salandanan et al
as 1:2021cv01887
Plaintiff:
Charles R Dorsey, Jr.
Defendant:
EAN Holdings, LLC, Interlude Furniture, Jackson Trucking Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lochetto v. McRae
as 1:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Gregory McRae and Chaplain Richards
Plaintiff:
Anthony M Lochetto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minardo et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
as 1:2020cv01119
Plaintiff:
Carol E Minardo and Anthony M. Minardo
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kuang Ou-Young v. John Roberts, Jr.
as 19-2216
Defendant / Appellee:
A. W. RUPSKA, DONALD M. O'KEEFE, JAMES MCNAIR THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG BAO OU-YOUNG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
