Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Locricchio v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv00445
Defendant:
Attorney General William Barr, Senator Martha McSally, Sec. of Treasury Munichen and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Locricchio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Edwin Coston v. Donald Holbrook, et al
as 20-35218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWIN RANDAL COSTON, AKA Allah
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY MALONE, DOC Records, MARY I. YU, Supreme Court Judge, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, Secretary Department of Corrections and others
Edwin Coston v. Donald Holbrook, et al
as 20-35201
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY P. WARTNIK, King Co. Judge, BRUCE A. SPANNER, Franklin Co. Judge, MARY I. YU, Supreme Court Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWIN RANDAL COSTON, AKA Allah Allah, AKA NFN SP/C, 5% Nation of Islam
Allah v. Holbrook et al
as 2:2019cv02094
Defendant:
Annie Shock, Palmer J Robinson, Stephen Sinclair and others
Plaintiff:
Allah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luckert v. Smith
as 4:2019cv08204
Defendant:
Officer D. Smith, Brule, Mercado and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L Luckert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Holbrook et al
as 4:2019cv05282
Plaintiff:
Allah and NFN SP
Defendant:
Anthony P Wartnik, Palmer J Robinson, Stephen Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allah v. Holbrook et al
as 4:2019cv05178
Defendant:
Donald R Holbrook, Stephen Sinclair, Paul L Sherfey and others
Plaintiff:
NFN Allah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyter v. Trump
as 3:2019cv05379
Plaintiff:
Anthony P Keyter
Defendant:
D J Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeCandro v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04572
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Anthony P DeCandro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00474
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
