Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Anthony Parker v. Lehigh County Court Domestic Relation, et al
as 23-2920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMY E. STEPHEN, RICHARD BETZ, HALA T. KHOURLY and others
PARKER v. LEHIGH COUNTY COURT DOMESTIC RELATION SECTION et al
as 5:2023cv03263
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PARKER
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY COURT DOMESTIC RELATION SECTION, TAMMY E. STEPHEN, JUDGE MICHELLE L. PAYLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5208
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anthony Parker v. Staysail Properties LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Anthony Parker
Defendant:
Staysail Properties LLC and Management Marketing Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Anthony Parker, et al v. Julia Greenwood, et al
as 22-1677
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY PARKER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICHARD BETTS
Defendant / Appellee:
JULIA GREENWOOD, Director, CATHERINE L. WORMAN, Lehigh County Domestic Relations Section and TAMMY E. STEPHEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williamson v. Parker et al
as 1:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
Malik Williamson
Defendant:
Ray Anthony Parker and Richard Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
PARKER v. GREENWOOD et al
as 5:2020cv05334
Defendant:
CATHERINE L. WORMAN doing business as LEHIGH COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION, RICHARD BETTS, TAMMY E. STEPHEN and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
