Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
La Clinica De La Raza et al v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04980
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff: Maternal and Child Health Access, Central American Resource Center, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Amicus Curiae: GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), MinKwon Center for Community Action and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04975
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Maine, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae: GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), Women Lawyers on Guard Inc. and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, Center for Public Representation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
City and County of San Francisco v. Azar II et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02405
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco
Defendant: Roger Severino, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar II and others
Petitioner: State of California, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra
Interested Party: County of Santa Clara
Amicus Curiae: Service Employees International Union, Local 1021, Institute for Policy Integrity, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35105
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF MINNESOTA
Intervenor - Pending: DAVID GOLDEN
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, REX W. TILLERSON, Secretary of State and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF HAWAII
Amicus Curiae - Pending: TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND OTHER BUSINESSES, FRED KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY, LAW PROFESSORS AND CLINICIANS and others
State of Hawaii v. Trump Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00050
Defendant: Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Donald J. Trump and others
Plaintiff: State of Hawaii, Ismail Elshikh, Muslim Association of Hawaii, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, State of Oregon, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Intervenor: Frederick Banks, Ph.D. Vincent Lucas, Joseph Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
County of Santa Clara v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 3:2017cv00574
Plaintiff: County of Santa Clara
Defendant: Donald J. Trump, Dana J. Boente, Mark Sandy and others
Amicus Curiae: LifeMoves, City of Salinas, Administrative Law Professors and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Young Women's Christian Association of Silicon Valley
Intervenor Defendant: Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-35801
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Freedom From Religion v. Chino Valley Uni. Sch. Dist., et al
as 16-55425
Plaintiff / Appellee: FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant / Appellant: CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, JAMES NA, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in his official representative capacity, SYLVIA OROZCO, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in her official representative capacity and others
Intervenor: ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBERS KEN WILLIAMS, MARI BARKE, LISA SPARKS, JOHN BEDELL, REBECCA GOMEZ, IN THEIR OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITIES
Amicus Curiae: JUSTICE AND FREEDOM FUND, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and others
Freedom From Religion v. Chino Valley Uni. Sch. Dist., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-55425
Plaintiff - Appellee: FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, JAMES NA, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in his official representative capacity, SYLVIA OROZCO, Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education Board Member in her official representative capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: JUSTICE AND FREEDOM FUND, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE and others
Beverly Sevcik, et al v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 12-17668
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ALASKA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF IDAHO; STATE OF MONTANA; STATE OF NEBRASKA; STATE OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; and STATE OF UTAH, COLAGE, HAWAII PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CAREN CAFFERATA-JENKINS, GREG FLAMER, SARA GEIGER and others
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN E. SANDOVAL, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Nevada, AMY HARVEY, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Washoe County, Nevada, DIANA ALBA, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Clark County, Nevada and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: COALITION FOR THE PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?