Cases 1 - 10 of 254
Telematica Lefic, S.A. De C.V. et al v. Socorro Marin, et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Telemtica Lefic, S.A. De C.V., Dyntra, S.A. De C.V., Rosa Maria Romero Vargas and others
Defendant:
Antonio J. Socorro Marin and Iquantics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lopez v. Corby et al
as 2:2024cv10626
Plaintiff:
Antonio J. Lopez
Defendant:
Corby, Martinez, Smirnes and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Robert Cason v. Middlesex County Prosecutor Office, et al
as 24-1026
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. CASON
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, OLD BRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, G. BRACHT and others
Negron v. Lumpkin
as 23-50852
Petitioner / Appellant:
Antonio J. Negron
Respondent / Appellee:
State of Texas and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Negron v. State of Texas
as 1:2023cv01238
Petitioner:
Antonio J. Negron
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DELEON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10759
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO J DELEON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OSBORN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv12752
Plaintiff:
JULIE L OSBORN and ANTONIO J OSBORN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MIRANDA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22650
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO J MIRANDA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
