Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Patton v. McClain et al
as 2:2023cv01024
Petitioner:
John Henry Patton
Respondent:
Antonio McClain and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shropshire v. McClain et al
as 4:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
Donnie Earl Shropshire
Defendant:
Antonio McClain, Etowah County Circuit Court, James E Hedgspeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Timothy Melendez
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heard v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Corey Bernard Heard
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Billingsley v. McClain et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Billingsley
Defendant:
Antonio McClain, Lt. Spence, J. Prioyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodyard v. King et al
as 1:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Draper Frank Woodyard
Defendant:
Captain Antonio McClain and J. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Fountain Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rashad Lee
Defendant:
Fountain Correctional Facility, Antonio McClain and Captain McNeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Frazier v. Antonio McClain
as 21-14340
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNIS DWAYNE FRAZIER
Respondent / Appellee:
ANTONIO MCCLAIN
Scott v. Dunn et al
as 2:2021cv00573
Plaintiff:
Darryl Elton Scott
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Antonio McClain, Corrections Officer Hosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickinson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00281
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Patrice Richie Jones, Capt. McCorvey and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
