Cases 81 - 90 of 243
Intel Corporation et al v. Fortress Investment Group LLC et al
as 3:2019cv07651
Plaintiff:
Intel Corporation and Apple Inc.
Defendant:
VLSI Technology LLC, Uniloc USA, Inc., Uniloc 2017 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Fine et al v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv05863
Defendant:
Arthur D. Levinson, Craig Federighi, Ronald D. Sugar and others
Plaintiff:
The Rosenfeld Family Foundation, Andrew Fine and Tammy Federman SEP/IRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sermons v. Apple Inc
as 4:2019cv03796
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Plaintiff:
Barry Sermons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cameron et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2019cv03074
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Cameron and Pure Sweat Basketball, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Steamfitters Local 449 Pension Plan v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02891
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Luca Maestri and Timothy D. Cook
Plaintiff:
Steamfitters Local 449 Pension Plan
Lawrence v. Apple Inc.
as 4:2019cv02852
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edward Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Reddy v. Apple Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02615
Plaintiff:
Priyam Reddy
Defendant:
Luca Maestri, Timothy D. Cook and Apple Inc.
IN RE APPLE INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 4:2019cv02033
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Luca Maestri and Timothy D. Cook
Plaintiff:
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System
Petitioner:
Michael Grecco, Shaikh M. Ahmad, Employees' Retirement System of the State of Rhode Island and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Steamfitters Local 449 Pension Plan and Priyam Reddy
Interested Party:
Terrence Zehrer and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, Ltd
Not Classified By Court:
Pegatron Corporation and Pegatron USA, Inc.
In re Apple, Inc. et al
as 3:2019mc80046
In Re:
Apple Korea, Inc. and Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monica Emerson v. Apple Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00829
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and Apple Inc.
Plaintiff:
Monica Emerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
