Cases 41 - 50 of 208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv11280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jake English v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 19-20412
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, L.L.C. and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAKE ANTHONY ENGLISH
Hamm v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 3:2019cv00107
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Aramark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hamm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2019cv00888
Defendant:
SGT. Villaboboz, Sheriff Ed Gonzales and Aramark Harris County
Plaintiff:
Lastersteen Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aramark Educational Services, LLC et al v. Phelps Dunbar, LLP
as 3:2018cv00733
Plaintiff:
Aramark Services, Inc. and Aramark Educational Services, LLC
Defendant:
Phelps Dunbar, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aramark Healthcare Support Services LLC et al v. Star Medical Center, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00647
Plaintiff:
Aramark Healthcare Support Services LLC and Aramark Healthcare Technologies LLC
Defendant:
MEDONE Texas MSO, LLC and Star Medical Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ready v. Jackson Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dion Ready
Defendant:
Jackson County ADC, Jackson Public Defenders Office, Jackson County Circuit Courts and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enriquez v. Aramark Business Dining Services of Texas, LLC
as 4:2018cv02861
Defendant:
Aramark Business Dining Services of Texas, LLC
Plaintiff:
Martin E Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Cowen v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
as 3:2018cv02166
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC
Plaintiff:
Cody Cowen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
