Cases 81 - 90 of 322
Lowell Jackson v. Eddie Climmer, et al
as 18-35235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOWELL EDWARD JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE CLIMMER, BILL BRADY and ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, Inc.
Watson v. Emmitt et al
as 4:2018cv00877
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wayne Watson, Corey Norris, Gregory Scott Richardson and others
Defendant:
Ed Emmitt, Ed Gonzales, John Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Dona Ana County Detention Center et al
as 2:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Burke
Defendant:
Dona Ana County Detention Center, Enrique Vigil, Ken Miyagishima and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curlee v. Callahan et al
as 2:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Curlee
Defendant:
Rachell E Callahan, John Matz, Todd Christopherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 1:2017cv01729
Plaintiff:
Tisdale DeMario Griffin
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee Sheriff Dept , Milwaukee County Jail Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruse v. Ms. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
Andrew Clinton Cruse, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Dept. of Corrections, Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Oldham et al
as 2:2017cv02749
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
William Bill Oldham, Robert Moore, Greenleaf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillum v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 2:2017cv01266
Plaintiff:
Michael L Gillum
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Armor Correctional Health Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lathem v. Dockery et al
as 4:2017cv00609
Plaintiff:
Teresa Lathem
Defendant:
Dewayne Dockery, Barry K Caver, Denton County Health Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McWillis v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 1:2017cv06606
Plaintiff:
David McWillis
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Orange County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
