Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Smith v. Collier
as 3:2026cv00800
Petitioner:
Archie Lee Smith
Respondent:
Brian Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43687
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE D SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv11149
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE D SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv70645
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE D SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv69141
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE LEE SMITH JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Archie Smith
as 17-10906
Petitioner:
In re: ARCHIE LEE SMITH
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
COTTON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA FIDUCIARY TRUSTEE et al
as 1:2017cv00003
Plaintiff:
DAVID-WILLIAM COTTON
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA FIDUCIARY TRUSTEE, STEPHANIE REAMS, ARCHIE L. SMITH, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Akerhielm et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv01352
Plaintiff:
Steven Akerhielm , Robert Buchanan , Kenneth W. Dunaway, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Archie Smith
as 16-12009
Petitioner:
In re: ARCHIE JUNIOR SMITH
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lorraine Lewis v. Archie Smith
as 16-1386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORRAINE BLACKWELL LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ARCHIE L. SMITH, KELLY S. KING, JEFF D. ROGERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
