Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ardisam, Inc. v. Spreetail, LLC
as 3:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Ardisam, Inc.
Defendant:
Spreetail, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ardisam, Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Ardisam, Inc and Ardisam, Inc.
Defendant:
United States, United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Trade Representative and others
Schema et al v. Rivers Edge Tree Stands, Inc et al
as 0:2019cv02876
Defendant:
Rivers Edge Treestands, Inc., Ardisam, Inc. and Rivers Edge Tree Stands, Inc
Plaintiff:
Anthony and Julie Schema, Anthony C. Schema and Julie Schema
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarter et al v. Ardisam, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06695
Plaintiff:
Richard McCarter , Justin Comeaux and Anthony McCarter
Defendant:
Ardisam, Inc. and Tractor Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
North Winds Escape, Inc. v. Ardisam, Inc.
as 0:2014cv05092
Plaintiff:
North Winds Escape, Inc.
Defendant:
Ardisam, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Feldmann Engineering & Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Ardisam, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00727
Plaintiff:
Feldmann Engineering & Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Ardisam, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Smith v. Ardisam, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00853
Plaintiff:
Ronald Smith
Defendant:
Ardisam, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ardisam, Inc. et al v. The Sportsman's Guide, Inc.
as 0:2012cv01407
Plaintiff:
Ardisam, Inc. and Rivers Edge Treestands, Inc.
Defendant:
The Sportsman's Guide, Inc. , Ronald Hendrickson and Guy Haaland
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Eton America LLC v. Ardisam Inc
as 7:2010cv03054
Plaintiff:
Eton America LLC
Defendant:
Ardisam Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Carpenter et al v. Ardisam, Inc.
as 5:2009cv06115
Plaintiff:
Dennis G. Carpenter and Darlene M. Carpenter
Defendant:
Ardisam, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
