Cases 61 - 70 of 2,041
Fred Williams v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1519
Petitioner:
Fred L. Williams
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Alvin Aikens v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1481
Petitioner:
Alvin Dejuan Aikens
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Michael Johnson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-1433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Benny Magness, Board of Correction, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Kellebrew v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Marcus A Kellebrew
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Community Corrections, Arkansas Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1413
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tommy Kimball v. Justine Minor, et al
as 23-1416
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tommy J. Kimball
Defendant / Appellee:
Justine Minor, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Arkansas Department of Corrections and Kimberly Chatman, Disciplinary Officer, Cummins Unit
Zeckeya Perry v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zeckeya Perry
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Lorenzo Kellon v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1356
Petitioner:
Lorenzo L. Kellon
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Trencie Oliver v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1323
Petitioner:
Trencie V. Oliver
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Stockton v. Page
as 4:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Joe Page, Arkansas Department of Corrections, M Cobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
