Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SOTAT, LLC v. Arlo Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
SOTAT, LLC
Defendant:
Arlo Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tibbs et al v. Arlo Technologies, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05096
Plaintiff:
Casey Tibbs, Andrew Castillo and Eric Wilim
Defendant:
Arlo Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carter v. Arlo Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Henry Carter
Defendant:
Arlo Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rider v. Arlo Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Lonn Rider
Defendant:
Arlo Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Arlo Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01206
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Arlo Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arlo Technologies, Inc. v. Skybell Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00218
Defendant:
SB IP Holdings, LLC, Skybell Technologies, Inc. and Eyetalk365, LLC
Plaintiff:
Arlo Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Intexact Technologies Limited v. Arlo Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01513
Defendant:
Arlo Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Intexact Technologies Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Pebble Tide LLC v. Arlo Technologies, Inc.
as 20-1523
Defendant / Appellee:
ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEBBLE TIDE LLC
Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems, LLC v. Arlo Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01606
Defendant:
Arlo Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cledera v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv01997
Defendant:
United States, RING (Amazon Inc), Charles Edge and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul M Cledera and Robert Paul Magtulis Cledera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
