Cases 41 - 50 of 376
Salazar-Velasquez v. Hudson et al
as 5:2022cv03287
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Alfonso Salazar-Velasquez
Defendant:
D. Hudson, (fnu) Armijo, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Crandall v. Armijo et al
as 4:2022cv01109
Plaintiff:
Christopher Crandall
Defendant:
Armijo, Hurst and Stacey Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo v. Board of County Commissioners for the County of Socorro et al
as 2:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Julian Carrillo
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for the County of Socorro, William Armijo, Richard V Lopez, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ARMIJO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20961
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROBERT ARMIJO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Elizondo v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Richard Armijo Elizondo
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Standard Insurance Company v. Lakey et al
as 1:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
Standard Insurance Company
Defendant:
rebecca Armijo lakey, Xena Lakey, E. L. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
GONZALEZ-ARMIJO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12105
Plaintiff:
JUAN GABRIEL GONZALEZ-ARMIJO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armijo v. Adams County et al
as 1:2022cv01847
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Armijo
Defendant:
Adams County, Sheriff Richard Reigenborn, Nichole Durante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armijo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02497
Plaintiff:
Marina Armijo
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
