Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Noel v. United Better Homes, LLC, et al
as 24-1281
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD A. NOEL
Defendant:
UNITED BETTER HOMES, LLC, Home Improvement Corporation, HERIBERTO ROMAN, Principal Owner of United Better Homes, Inc. and UBH Solar, BRIAN COUTCHER, Director of Sales for United Better Homes and others
Noel v. Romelus, et al
as 23-2058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD A. NOEL, on behalf of himself and A.G.N. and B.M.N.
Defendant:
BARTHINE ROMELUS, PAUL M. CRONAN, BRAILEY E. NEWTON and others
Noel et al v. Cronan et al
as 1:2023cv12299
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel, Arnold G Noel, Jr., Bartley M. Noel and others
Defendant:
Paul M Cronan, Barthine Romelus, Brailey Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Noel v. Hartzell et al
as 1:2023cv10716
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel
Defendant:
Neil Hartzell, Kathleen A Reagan and Mark Coven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Noel v. United Better Homes, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Arnold A. Noel
Defendant:
United Better Homes, LLC, Heriberto Roman, Brian Coutcher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Noel v. Freeman, Mathis and Gary LLP et al
as 1:2022cv11537
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel
Defendant:
Freeman, Mathis and Gary LLP, Flynn, Wirkus, Young, P.C, Department of Children and Family and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Noel v. Coven et al
as 1:2022cv11512
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel
Defendant:
Judge Mark Coven, Braintree Police Department and Stuart Brian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Noel v. Orfanello et al
as 1:2022cv11494
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel
Defendant:
Judge Mary A. Orfanello and Kathleen A Reagan, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Noel v. Hawaiian Telecom et al
as 1:2022cv11423
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel
Defendant:
Hawaiian Telecom, Eric K Yeaman, Steven Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
