Cases 1 - 10 of 253
Pugh v. Arredondo et al
as 5:2024cv01890
Plaintiff:
Darryl Pugh
Defendant:
S. Arredondo, Aceves, N. Cardenas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez Arredondo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-617
Petitioner:
YENIFER MARICRUZ ALVAREZ ARREDONDO, ILKER EDUARDO GONZALEZ ALVAREZ and ILDI DAMIAN GONZALEZ ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Samantha Arredondo v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 2:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA ARREDONDO
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samantha Arredondo v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Samantha Arredondo
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mijangos Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-2269
Petitioner:
FLOR DE MARIA MIJANGOS GOMEZ and LUIS ANGEL ARREDONDO MIJANGO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Alexis Gonzalez et al v. Factor75, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv06293
Plaintiff:
Alexis Gonzalez and Joanna Arredondo
Defendant:
Factor75, LLC, Factor75, Inc. and Does 1 to 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
S. Wellons, et al v. PNS Stores, Inc., et al
as 23-55665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
S. WELLONS, C. ARREDONDO, S. DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PNS STORES, INC., a California corporation and BIG LOTS STORES, INC., an Ohio Corporation
Arredondo Vazquez v. Garland
as 23-992
Petitioner:
JAIME ARREDONDO VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
