Cases 1 - 7 of 7
CHAPMAN JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv82655
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ARTHUR CHAPMAN JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander et al v. Axiall Corp
as 2:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Alexander, Jr , E'miree Alexander , E'monee Alexander and others
Defendant:
Axiall Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blatt v. King County et al
as 2:2015cv01762
Plaintiff:
Leon S Blatt
Defendant:
King County, Arthur Chapman and Eileen Kato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abney et al v. Axiall Corp
as 2:2015cv00300
Plaintiff:
Christopher Abney , Delores Alaniz , Delores Alanix and others
Defendant:
Axiall Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Parker et al
as 4:2007cv03036
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Jones and Elizabeth Jones
Defendant:
Sanford M Parker, Jr, Chesterfield County Sheriff's Department, Chesterfield County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gates, et al v. TX Dept Protc & Regu, et al
as 06-20763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELISSA GATES, and as next friend to Sarah Gates, Derodrick Gates, Travis Gates, Raquel Gates, Cynthia Gates, Cassandra Gates, Timothy Gates, Andrew Gates, Alexis Gates, and Marcus Gates, GARY WILTON GATES, GEORGE GATES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PROTECTIVE AND REGULATORY SERVICES, Childrens Protective Services, THOMAS CHAPMOND, JERRY POLASEK and others
Amicus Curiae:
HOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF TEXAS, TEXAS EAGLE FORUM and others
Gates, et al v. TX Dept Protective, et al
as 4:2002cv00495
Plaintiff:
Gary Gates and Melissa Gates
Defendant:
Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, Thomas Chapmond, Karen Sheehan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Texas State Teachers Association and Texas Association of School Boards Legal Assistance Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
