Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Winston Holloway v. Benny Magness, et al
as 14-3383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Winston Holloway
Defendant - Appellee:
Benny Magness, Board Chairman, ADC, Artis Ray Hobbs, Director, ADC, Rory Griffin, Director and others
Martz v. Iko et al
as 5:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
Hollis Devin Martz
Defendant:
Iko, Grizwold, Deborah L York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2014cv00314
Plaintiff:
Carl D Jackson
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs , Marvin Evans , William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Hobbs
as 5:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Davis
Defendant:
Artis Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Hobbs
as 5:2014cv00303
Plaintiff:
Marvin Anderson
Defendant:
Artis Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morrow v. Matthews et al
as 5:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Berry Morrow
Defendant:
Shelia Matthews, Stanley Robinson, Kendrick Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Winston v. Charles Stewart, et al
as 14-2521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles A. Winston
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles Stewart, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Lathan Ester, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Danny Burl, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC and others
Nelson v. Colvin et al
as 0:2014cv02171
Plaintiff:
Artis Nelson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Phillip Williams v. Artis Hobb
as 14-2347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Phillip D. Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
Artis Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Couch et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00955
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Milton Couch , Alfredo Diaz , Marcella Buter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
