Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Patel et al v. Patel et al
as 6:2016cv00415
Plaintiff:
Ashvinkumar Patel and Kamuben Patel
Defendant:
Arvindbhai C. Patel, Nayanaben Patel, SAI, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Patel et al v. Patel et al
as 5:2016cv00846
Plaintiff:
Ashvinkumar Patel and Kamuben Patel
Defendant:
Arvindbhai C Patel, Nayanaben Patel, Sai LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Ricchio v. McLean, et al
as 16-1680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA RICCHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK MCLEAN, ASHVINKUMAR PATEL, SIMA PATEL and others
Intervenor:
PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Ricchio et al
as 1:2016cv10032
Plaintiff:
PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
Lisa Ricchio, Bijal, Inc. , Ashvinkumar Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ricchio v. McLean et al
as 1:2015cv13519
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ricchio
Defendant:
Clark McLean, Ashvinkumar Patel, Sima Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. SAI, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01867
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
SAI, LLC, ARVINDBHAI PATEL, NAYANABEN PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
