Cases 41 - 50 of 95
National Association of Home, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 17-1073
Petitioner:
National Association of Home Builders, Mason Contractors Association of America and Associated Builders and Contractors
Respondent:
Occupational Safety & Health Administration, United States Department of Labor and Edward Charles Hugler, Acting Secretary, United States Department of Labor
Interpipe Contracting, Inc., et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 17-55263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERPIPE CONTRACTING, INC.
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATION COMMITEEE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations and JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as California Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Interpipe Contracting, Inc., et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 17-55248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERPIPE CONTRACTING, INC. and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATION COMMITEEE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations and JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as California Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
O'Malley v. Lakhany et al
as 4:2017cv00246
Plaintiff:
James O'Malley
Defendant:
Hashim Lakhany, Samir E. Habayeb, Continental Superior Management Group GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Assoc Bldr and Contr of SE TX, et al v. Anne Rung, et al
as 16-41707
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS, ASSOCIATED BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITY COMPANIES
Defendant - Appellant:
ANNE RUNG, Administrator, Office of Federal Procurement Policy, Office of Management and Budget, ASHTON B. CARTER, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DENISE T. ROTH, Administrator, United States General Services Administration and others
Associated Builders and Contractors of Southest Texas et al v. Rung et al
as 1:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
Associated Builders and Contractors of Southest Texas , Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. and National Association of Security Companies
Defendant:
Anne Rung , Ashton B. Carter , Denise T. Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
State of Nevada et al v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 4:2016cv00731
Plaintiff:
State of Nevada , State of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor, Thomas E Perez, Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor The and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Plano Chamber of Commerce , Texas Association of Business , Allen-Fairview Chamber of Commerce and others
Consol_defendant:
Thomas E Perez , David Weil and U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plano Chamber of Commerce et al v. Perez et al
as 4:2016cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plano Chamber of Commerce , Texas Association of Business , Allen-Fairview Chamber of Commerce and others
Defendant:
Thomas E Perez , David Weil and U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Jorge Amaya v. Power Design, Incorporated
as 15-1691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY O. COREA MONTALVAN, RAUL D. AMPUDIA, MARIO ANTONIO SIGUENZA DIAZ and others
Amicus Curiae:
SECRETARY OF LABOR and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
POWER DESIGN, INCORPORATED
Associated Builders and Contractors of California Cooperation Committee, Inc. et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2016cv02247
Plaintiff:
Associated Builders and Contractors of California Cooperation Committee, Inc. and Interpipe Contracting, inc.
Defendant:
Kamala Harris, Christine Baker and Julie Su
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0151
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
