Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 33
CHILDRENS HEALTH DEFENSE et al v. W P CO LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02735
Plaintiff: CHILDRENS HEALTH DEFENSE, TRIALSITE INC, CREATIVE DESTRUCTION MEDIA INC and others
Defendant: W P CO doing business as WASHINGTON POST, BRITISH BROADCASTING CORP, ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Petitioner: STATE OF LOUISIANA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00745
Plaintiff: NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER and ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party: ROB RAWSON, ROSEMARIE HOWELL and TROY LAW, PLLC
Petitioner: JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, DON KOZICH, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS and others
Amicus Curiae: ASSOCIATION OF ALTERNATIVE NEWS MEDIA, TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, THOMAS BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
AL-BAIDANY et al v. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2005cv02380
Petitioner: ZAKARIA AL-BAIDANY, ABDEL AZIZ AL-SWIDI, AHMED MOHAMMED HASSIN AL RAMMAH and others
Respondent: GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD HENRY RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ABDAH et al v. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv01254
Petitioner: MAHMOAD ABDAH AHMED, MAJID MAHMOUD AHMED, MAHMOAD ABDAH and others
Respondent: GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae: CHARLES B. GITTINGS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC. et al v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2023cv01014
Plaintiff: ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Defendant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO COMMUNITY SERVICE RECORDS et al
as 1:2021mc00166
In Re: PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO COMMUNITY SERVICE RECORDS
Petitioner: CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC. doing business as ABC NEWS, ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Respondent: LORI VINSON and THOMAS VINSON
MEADOWS v. PELOSI et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv03217
Plaintiff: MARK MEADOWS
Defendant: NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHENEY and others
Intervenor: CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
IN RE PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO PRESS COALITIONS MOTION FOR ACCESS TO VIDEO EXHIBITS AND TO SET ASIDE STANDING ORDER NO. 21-28
as 1:2021mc00084
Petitioner: BUZZFEED, INC. doing business as BUZZFEED NEWS, GANNETT CO., INC., NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC. and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED VIDEO EXHIBITS
PARACHA v. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv02022
Petitioner: SAIFULLAH PARACHA, FARHAT PARACHA, ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Defendant: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Interested Party: PRIVILEGE TEAM
Respondent: GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD HENRY RUMSFELD and JAY HOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ANAM et al v. BUSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv01194
Petitioner: BISHER NASER ALI ALMARWALH, MASAAB OMAR AL-MADHWANI, ABDULKHALIQ AL-BAIDHANI and others
Respondent: GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae: CHARLES B. GITTINGS, JR., MUSLIM ADVOCATES, DUE PROCESS SCHOLARS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?