Cases 31 - 40 of 335
Adom v. CDCR et al
as 4:2022cv07150
Plaintiff:
Bilal Adom
Defendant:
CDCR, M. Atchley, Dr. Montegrande and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrel Brannon v. Orozco, et al
as 22-16728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREL GERRARD BRANNON
Defendant / Appellee:
OROZCO, Sgt., A. PACHECO, C/O, COVARRUBIAS, Sgt. and others
Ritesman v. Officer Cena, et al
as 5:2022cv05219
Plaintiff:
Cody Hawke Ritesman
Defendant:
Washington County Detention Center, Officer Cena, Corporal Corley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Atchley et al
as 3:2022cv05825
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Baker
Defendant:
M. Atchley, T. Lemon, E. Borla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ATCHLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19099
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ELIC ATCHLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shikeb Saddozai v. A. Carwithen, et al
as 22-16482
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
Defendant / Appellee:
A. CARWITHEN, Correctional Officer, M. B. ATCHLEY, Warden, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
R. Murillo v. John Thich, et al
as 22-16374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. MONA MURILLO
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THICH, Correctional Sgt., E. BEAM, Correctional Lt., VERONICA LOMELI, Captain and others
Atchley v. Kelso Housing Authority
as 3:2022cv05607
Plaintiff:
Tammy Atchley
Defendant:
Kelso Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
ATCHLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10564
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID ATCHLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Meyers v. Kernan et al
as 1:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Leon Lee Meyers
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, K. Allison, R. Gamboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
