Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Kimberly Potter v. Debra Wehrle, et al
as 24-3097
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY POTTER
Defendant:
DEBRA GORRELL WEHRLE, AUBREY COOK and OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Scott v. Attorney General Office
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv11586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
City of Knoxville, Tennessee v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00544
Defendant:
Hulu, LLC and Netflix, Inc.
Plaintiff:
City of Knoxville, Tennessee
Intervenor:
Tennessee Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Cassandra McGuire v. TN, et al
as 22-5614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSANDRA MCGUIRE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, JUDGE ALLEN KERN, Magistrate Judge; Attorney General Office and LAUREN KISNER, District Attorney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tara VanHooser v. Dist Atty Gen office for 12th Judicial Dist of, TN, et al
as 22-5036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TARA VANHOOSER
Defendant / Appellee:
12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, TN, GRUNDY COUNTY, TN, GRUNDY COUNTY, TN, SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cedeno v. Ohio Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2020cv02659
Defendant:
Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Ohio Attorney General Office and Mary Anne Reese
Plaintiff:
Noel Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
