Cases 1 - 10 of 367
Smith-Catchings v. Tripp et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Xavier Lushun Smith-Catchings
Defendant:
Chris Tripp, Rebecca Bowker, Brad Peterson and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming-Martin v. Tripp et al
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Skyler Fleming-Martin
Defendant:
Chris Tripp, Don Martinez, Correctional Officer and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooks v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jose Cooks
Defendant:
Chris Tripp, Shawn Atwater, Kipp Jones and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atwater Retirement Village LLC v. Datig
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Atwater Retirement Village LLC Doing business as Castle Vista Seniors Community
Defendant:
Mitch Datig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
(HC) Givens v. Warden at USP Atwater
as 1:2024cv00317
Petitioner:
Gregory Latrell Givens
Respondent:
Warden at USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Troupe v. Morgan et al
as 4:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Tashonda Troupe
Defendant:
Daniel J. Morgan and Jordan Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lorie Atwater v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Lorie Atwater
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Deputy Brian Hudson, Detective Soraya Ely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Chen v. Warden, USP Atwater
as 1:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Jia Wu Chen
Respondent:
Warden, USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC)McCoy v. Warden at USP Atwater
as 1:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Reggie L. McCoy
Respondent:
Warden at USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
