Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Rodriguez v. Autozone, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01494
Plaintiff:
Iliana Bernabe Rodriguez
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Jarvis v. AutoZone, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
Yvette Jarvis
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc. and AutoZoners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Powell v. AutoZone Inc
as 2:2024cv02016
Not Yet Classified:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Jason Powell
Defendant:
AutoZone Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ortiz v. AutoZoners LLC
as 7:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Manuel Angel Ortiz
Defendant:
AutoZoners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Andino v. Autozoners, LLC
as 1:2023cv06410
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Andino
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lett v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lett
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and AUTOZONERS, LLC Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lewis v. Autozoners, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01441
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lewis
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Duran v. Autozoners, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv07817
Plaintiff:
Jofeny Duran
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC, Autozone Stores, Inc. and Autozone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Mendiaz v. AutoZoners LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MENDIAZ
Defendant:
AutoZoners LLC and AutoZone Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jonas v. AutoZoners LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03672
Plaintiff:
Corry Jonas
Defendant:
AutoZoners LLC, AutoZone, Stores, Inc. and AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
