Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022xc01537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Mendiaz v. AutoZoners LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MENDIAZ
Defendant:
AutoZoners LLC and AutoZone Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ministrap, LLC v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Ministrap, LLC
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Courtney v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
Dewey Courtney and Kimberly Courtney
Defendant:
Eaton Hydraulics, Viacomcbs Inc, GlaxoSmithKline LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Himmel Management Co LLC and McWane Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Dodds v. Autozone, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00289
Defendant:
Autozone West, LLC, Autozone Texas, LLC and Autozone, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tricia Bopp Dodds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. AutoZone, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00411
Plaintiff:
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Foreign Trade Zone Operating Company of Texas v. AZIMC Investments Inc et al
as 3:2018cv03174
Defendant:
AZIMC Investments Inc and AutoZone Inc
Plaintiff:
Foreign Trade Zone Operating Company of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
