Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Ramos v. Platte County Sheriff et al
as 8:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Jonathan F. Ramos
Defendant:
Platte County Sheriff, Edward J. Wemhoff, Platte County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila v. Nebraska Dept of Correctional Services
as 8:2023cv00453
Petitioner:
Antonio Avila, Jr.
Respondent:
Nebraska Dept of Correctional Services
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adkins et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02641
Plaintiff:
Todd Adkins, Temitope Amusa, Julio Avila and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Jose Morelos-Avila v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2640
Petitioner:
Jose Guadalupe Morelos-Avila
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
United States v. Cesar Avila-Hernandez
as 23-2549
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Cesar Ramon Avila-Hernandez, also known as Caesar Ramon Avila Hernandez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Avila v. Thornburgh
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Travis Avila
Defendant:
Cody Thornburgh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Avila v. Schnell et al
as 0:2022cv03180
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Gutierrez Avila, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Vicki Janssen, Jeanette Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv04138
Plaintiff:
Elvia Avila
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
