Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Abarca et al v. 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.) et al
as 2:2026cv05601
Defendant:
TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP, individually and as successor-in-interest to The Ansul Company, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, individually and as successor in interest to DuPont Chemical Solutions Enterprise, NATIONAL FOAM, INC and others
Plaintiff:
Emily Bane, Talisa Banda, Brandon Banas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Qi v. Rubio et al
as 3:2026cv06379
Defendant:
John Doe, Julie Eadeh, John Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Ji Qi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ARMSTRONG v. BURKETT et al
as 5:2026cv00319
Respondent:
FCI MARIANA and BURKETT
Petitioner:
IESHA NICHOLE ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spears v. County of El Dorado, et al.
as 26-7461
Defendant:
SUSANNA KURK, EDCJ Dentist, GARCIA, HANDY and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SPEARS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv63128
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03912
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Armstrong v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2026cv00388
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Samantha R. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Abercrombie et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv01520
Defendant:
Lake Shore Obstetrics and Gynecology, L.L.C., Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC, Pharmacia LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Candalece Elaine Coleman-Lambert, Fantase Coleman, Tamera Coburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
SE Synod Of The Evangelical Lutheran Church, et al v. Steven Finney, et al
as 26-5990
Defendant:
HANS SCHWENDIMANN, All in their official capacities as the district attorneys general of Tennessee, CHRIS STANFORD, in their official capacities as the district attorneys general of Tennessee, STEVEN JOHN MULROY, in their official capacities as the district attorneys general of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, GARRETT CAUSEY, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons and SOUTHEASTERN SYNOD OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
