Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Patterson v. McCormick et al
as 2:2013cv00293
Plaintiff:
Erwin B. Patterson
Defendant:
John McCormick and Lisa Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Naro v. Patterson et al
as 7:2012cv03986
Plaintiff:
Deborah Naro
Defendant:
Robert B. Patterson, Lee A. Lemaster, Hertz Vehicle, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaupo Mauka, LLC v. Owali (k) Heirs and Assigns et al
as 1:2011cv00698
Plaintiff:
Kaupo Mauka, LLC
Defendant:
Owali (k) Heirs and Assigns, L. Kekahuna (k) Heirs and Assigns, Kaonohi Poouahi Heirs and Assigns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Rodgers v. Lopez et al
as 1:2011cv00630
Plaintiff:
Synrico Rodgers
Defendant:
R. Lopez, T. A. Weber, R. Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Lopez et al
as 2:2011cv00821
Plaintiff:
Synrico Rodgers
Defendant:
R. Lopez, T. A. Weber, R. Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erwin Patterson, Jr. v. US
as 11-1231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, STUART GORDON and others
Erwin Patterson, Jr. v. Teide Enterprises, Inc.
as 11-1117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, SARA ASHLEY JOHN, STUART GORDON and others
Erwin B. Patterson, Jr. v. Towne Bank et al
as 11-1113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNE BANK, WILLIAM COPELAND, WILLIAM T. HODSDEN and others
PATTERSON v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2010cv84041
Plaintiff:
JOHN B PATTERSON
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson v. United States of America et al
as 3:2010cv00865
Plaintiff:
Erwin B. Patterson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Teide Enterprises Inc., Stuart Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
